Nvidia boss says AI ‘doesn’t need new laws’ as safety concerns grow
Nvidia boss says AI 'doesn't need new laws' as safety concerns grow. 25% off tickets now Back by popular demand: Save up to $300 on Disrupt Close Image Credits:Chesnot / Getty Images AI We don’t need AI regulation — leave safety to us, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says Julie Bort 5:20 PM PDT · September 15, 2026 Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang made his position on the dangers AI poses very clear while speaking at Salesforce’s Dreamforce conference on Tuesday.
What happened
"We don't need new laws or regulations," Huang said, adding that there should not be a "false choice" between the speed of innovation and the safety of AI products. Figure caption, 'There is a possibility of human extinction,' former Anthropic employee says about AIAltman sounded similar safety concerns in a new interview, telling Fortune magazine that standards were "not at a place" to push AI capabilities much further. It’s a complicated computing system, but it’s ultimately a computing system. ” Therefore, there’s no need for new laws or regulations to govern it, he argues.
In fact, Huang sees little need for new laws at all. And AI has already caused harm, too, whatever the intentions or safety testing involved, from an OpenAI model hacking into Hugging Face to lawsuits against the AI lab over the suicides of young people who engaged in long conversations with its chatbot. Though Huang is right that it’s possible existing product liability laws could cover AI — if AI doesn’t somehow kill us all before enough cases get through the courts to test that theory.
As Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said at the All-In Summit on Monday, “China should also deeply care about the same safety concerns if the United States cares about them, right?
The wider picture
ByKali HaysTechnology reporterPublished15 September 2026Updated 3 hours agoOpenAI boss Sam Altman thinks people should have more faith in his company and others like it to do the right thing when it comes to artificial intelligence (AI) development amid rising public concerns about all the risks. Image source, ReutersImage caption, OpenAI is an AI industry leaderAfter Altman's comments, Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg wrote on X that every AI lab has the ability and the incentive "to take its own actions" towards making AI tools and models that are designed for safety.
"Why doomsday warnings are not the only threat to the AI juggernautPublished5 hours agoTrump says AI safety fears a 'hoax' as he rejects calls for greater safeguardsPublished19 hours agoSome industry figures have argued resurgent AI fears were overblown and were being jumped on to generate hype for the industry. AI staff 'genuinely frightened' for humanity's future, ex-Anthropic researcher tells BBCPublished2 days agoAI regulation faces political deadlock as calls grow for Congress to actPublished1 day agoLeaders of OpenAI and Anthropic have said they have recently started working towards some sort of industry-wide agreement on safety.
Trump also called himself "the Hoax Buster", likening concerns about the safety of the technology to what he called "the RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA HOAX". Related topicsInternational BusinessArtificial intelligenceDonald TrumpUnited StatesMore on this storyAI regulation faces political deadlock as calls grow for Congress to actPublished1 day agoWhy are there concerns AI could threaten humanity, and how real are they? There have been growing concerns recently about the technology's potential risks. Cyber-security concerns have grown as new models have exhibited more and more powerful capabilities.
What has been reported
Jensen Huang's stance on AI safety contrasts with several current and former employees of AI-focused firm To him, AI isn’t some new form of “alien mind,” as at least one OpenAI safety researcher has described it. It’s just hardware and software, he says, built by humans. That means, in his view, it can be controlled by humans and existing laws. “Safety is an engineering problem, not a legal one,” he said. “If we’re not confident about the safety of the products, like all companies, like you and I, all the companies here, if you build a product or a service, and you’re not confident in its functionality, capability, or safety, then don’t release it.
We just need companies to decide that when [to] run as fast as they can. If anyone in the world knows AI, it is Nvidia’s founder, who’s been building the hardware brains of AI since well before ChatGPT existed and now runs a company that also makes open source models, agents, harnesses, and sandboxes.
What happens next
Why would he want regulation to come along and add in a layer of hinderance that could slow down Nvidia’s quest to sell ever more AI systems and software? Meta just paid $18 billion to settle a lawsuit over social media harms to children. The “leave them alone” strategy, which would let these companies release products as they see fit, could be an unwise approach to AI safety as far as society is concerned. Topics AI, Jensen Huang, nvidia When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission.
This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. BOOK NOW Most Popular Tesla says it will finally unveil the second-generation Roadster on October 1 Anthony Ha Revolut confirms customer data breach through fake government requests Jagmeet Singh OpenAI puts Pro subscriptions on hold due to Astra demand Sarah Perez Bending Spoons to buy collaboration tools maker Miro for $1. "It doesn't take as much imagination as it used to for [us] to imagine how this could go wrong," he said.
The report has been compiled by The Daily Waves using information reported across techcrunch.com, bbc.co.uk. Details are presented according to the information available at the time of publication and may change as authorities, organisers or other relevant parties provide updates.