Allowing AI firms to collude to ‘pace the frontier’ is a dangerous proposition

Allowing AI firms to collude to ‘pace the frontier’ is a dangerous proposition. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty ImagesAnalysisAllowing AI firms to collude to ‘pace the frontier’ is a dangerous propositionEduardo PorterTech CEOs banding together is an old ruse recycled from corporate America to get a pass from antitrust lawsAnthropic’s Dario Amodei is not the first corporate CEO to suggest that excessive competition is driving the world to some socially undesirable outcome.

What happened

But Amodei’s call for the leading artificial intelligence labs to coordinate to slow the breakneck pace of AI development, agree on safety standards and “pace the frontier”, (a call quickly endorsed by Open AI’s Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Google Deep Mind’s Demis Hassabis) is just a hi-tech version of an old proposition by corporate America – to get a pass from antitrust laws designed to protect the American economy from colluding businesses.

You should listen to the warnings about AIAlex TurnerWe must stop companies from allowing AI to self-improve into an uncontrollable level of intelligence Major AI lab CEOs advocated for slowing the pace of AI development this weekend. Warning of space arms race as US confirms weapons in Earth's orbitWarning of space arms race as US confirms weapons in Earth's orbitCloseThe US has confirmed it deployed a space weapon in Earth's orbit, the first time it has acknowledged such offensive capabilities.

The revelation comes in the wake of Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s essay, published Saturday, which called for the industry to work together to slow the pace of frontier AI and avoid catastrophic risks. Amodei’s essay proposed a narrow government waiver allowing such safety coordination, but Lehane reportedly said the firms don’t need one. Freeing the tech bros from antitrust constraints supposedly to allow them to get together and fix AI’s dangerous flaws, disenfranchises the everyday Americans who are most at risk from the thing, further empowering the very labs that, in their pursuit for wealth, greatness and who knows what other fantastical objectives, so casually blew past danger thresholds on many dimensions, bringing the existential threats into being.

But it does not justify giving businesses a right to collude as they see fit.

The wider picture

His call to slow the pace of AI development, bring external evaluators into the lab and increase the transparency of his operations suggests sincere concern over the risks. The drop in the price of leading tech stocks following the publication of his propositions suggests that he is willing to take a financial hit in the service of improved safety. Given the incentives, granting the AI leaders a free hand to collude and self-regulate would be foolhardy.

Inventors of safety innovations would be rewarded by allowing them to release new AI models before their competitors. But the safety enhancements would be made immediately available to all firms. On the stick side of the ledger, a legal liability regime could be designed to change the incentives of AI developers by punishing firms that gain from the design and deployment of an AI tool that caused harm, even if the harm was unintentional. In any event, cementing in place the dominance of the frontier labs, protecting their rents and endorsing their heretofore gung-ho strategies, is not pro-safety.

They are right to be concerned: the field runs an extremely dangerous race towards superintelligent AI.

What has been reported

The shape of the solution is simple: stop companies from allowing AI to self-improve into an uncontrollable level of intelligence. More specifically, the AI Futures Project’s “Plan A” is a credible starting proposal that limits AI harms while allowing fast AI progress to continue to benefit the world. Russia and China responded by warning of an arms race in space. AI leaders across the industry, including OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Google’s Demis Hassabis, and SpaceXAI’s Elon Musk, supported Amodei’s letter and call to action, with Altman saying that OpenAI would join Anthropic in embedding third-party evaluators into the company to monitor for safety.

The news confirms earlier reporting and hints that the companies were working together. At the same Tuesday meeting, Lehane said that OpenAI supports a provision in the FRONTIER Act that would force top frontier labs to allow “independent verification organizations” into their companies to ensure models are developed safely. BOOK NOW Most Popular The 9 buzziest startups from Y Combinator’s latest Demo Day, according to VCs Marina Temkin Dominic-Madori Davis Tesla says it will finally unveil the second-generation Roadster on October 1 Anthony Ha Revolut confirms customer data breach through fake government requests Jagmeet Singh OpenAI puts Pro subscriptions on hold due to Astra demand Sarah Perez Bending Spoons to buy collaboration tools maker Miro for $1.

36B, 90% less than its 2022 valuation Ram Iyer ID verification giant IDScan confirms data breach with more than 150 million driver’s licenses stolen Zack Whittaker Automattic’s board forces CEO Matt Mullenweg into leave of absence Julie Bort Sarah Perez Loading the next article Error loading the next article

What happens next

Photograph: Shaun HerbertsonReviewLenore review – incel’s obsession with online influencer turns into anatomy of dislocated digital-age mindsetDigital-age Australian psychodrama tracks the shut-in mania of dangerously disaffected male fan, but doesn’t get inside his mindIf the parasocial phenomenon is a kind of hell, then Max Wren, protagonist of this Australian digital-age psychodrama, resides in the ninth circle. But his ungainly debut film doesn’t fully transcend its stage origins to capture the splintered headspace of the terminally online.

Tech CEOs banding together is an old ruse recycled from corporate America to get a pass from antitrust lawsAnthropic’s Dario Amodei is not the first corporate CEO to suggest that excessive competition is driving the world to some socially undesirable outcome. The safety breach disclosed by OpenAI after a swarm of its agents coordinated to breach their supposedly secure sandbox, get on the Internet and hack AI platform Hugging Face, warrants urgent action. It demonstrated the ease with which the technology can evade human control and gave concrete form to the existential fears about what it could do to humanity if not securely leashed. Continue reading. . .

Skip to main contentSkip to navigation Dario Amodei, co-founder and CEO of Anthropic, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on 20 January 2026. The safety breach disclosed by OpenAI after a swarm of its agents coordinated to breach their supposedly secure sandbox, get on the Internet and hack AI platform Hugging Face, warrants urgent action. It demonstrated the ease with which the technology can evade human control and gave concrete form to the existential fears about what it could do to humanity if not securely leashed.

The end of the world may well be nigh, as some in the AI industry have warned.

The report has been compiled by The Daily Waves using information reported across theguardian.com, bbc.co.uk, techcrunch.com. Details are presented according to the information available at the time of publication and may change as authorities, organisers or other relevant parties provide updates.