Home Gadgets Cops Search Flock Cameras for Reasons of ‘LMAO,’ ‘IDK,’ and ‘Asdfg’
GADGETS

Cops Search Flock Cameras for Reasons of ‘LMAO,’ ‘IDK,’ and ‘Asdfg’

Cops Search Flock Cameras for Reasons of 'LMAO,' 'IDK,' and 'Asdfg'. Dhruv MehrotraThis Is Flock’s AI Search Tool for CopsWIRED rebuilt Flock’s latest search tool from code the company sends to a police officer’s browser.

What happened

Skip to main contentSave this storySave this storyA bipartisan pair of US lawmakers tell WIRED they plan to introduce legislation today that would strip federal funding from states that fail to restrict the use of Flock cameras and other automated license plate readers. The legislation says that Flock cameras could be used only for “enforcing toll systems, identifying stolen vehicles, missing or endangered persons, vehicles registered to persons with a warrant for a felony offense, or investigating a vehicle involved in a felony offense. ” Notably absent are uses like conducting traffic studies, investigating minor drug crimes, and enforcing parking and speeding rules.

Another bipartisan bill introduced in Congress recently called for banning the use of federal funding to purchase Flock cameras. Tech BacklashA number of issues related to emerging technologies, including rogue AI systems, data center construction, and law enforcement abuse of Flock cameras, have become major topics in the upcoming US midterm elections, which are now less than two months away. The president expressed support for Flock cameras on Sunday, telling reporters that they help law enforcement authorities.

Lawmakers largely agree, but they are frustrated by cases in which police officers have been caught using Flock footage for personal reasons, such as stalking their one-time romantic partners. “Flock cameras are enabling mass surveillance of Americans, infringing on the Fourth Amendment. ”About 25 states and US territories have laws about automated license plate readers, including mandating transparency about the systems and requiring unnecessary data to be promptly deleted, but few of the measures limit types of uses, according to the New York University School of Law’s Policing Project.

The wider picture

We Got Its CodeFlock’s surveillance cameras have already sparked outrage. Maddy VarnerYou Can Now Destroy Flock Cameras for Cash in GTA VA new GTA mod lets you smash and shoot Flock’s automatic license plate readers around the fictional Los Santos. The No FLOCK Act—for Federal License-Plate Observation and Camera Keeping—directs the US secretary of transportation to withhold 10 percent of annual financial support due to states for highways, roads, and bridges if it fails to ban Flock and similar devices for all but five use cases.

“Our investigation into Flock exposed serious gaps in oversight, and this bipartisan bill would put clear limits in place to prevent abuse while preserving legitimate public safety uses,” Krishnamoorthi said in a statement. But the bill stops short of banning Flock systems altogether, which has been the number one demand from supporters of a global protest movement against the Atlanta-based company and its competitors. It also doesn’t stop Flock users from broadly sharing license plate tracking data with other government agencies, including immigration authorities.

Flock did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the proposed bill. Flock’s lobbying spending in Washington, DC, has been steady over the past 18 months, and it recently hired a fifth firm to help with the efforts, according to federal records.

What has been reported

The reasons why show how vast—and invasive—the network has become. Caroline HaskinsFlock Has a Powerful New AI Tool for Police. Its AI can keep watch across multiple cameras for anyone fitting a written description. Matt BurgessICE Wants to Know Everyone Who Bought a Certain Green Beanie From REI in the Last 2 YearsHomeland Security Investigations agents hit the outdoor retailer with a controversial subpoena as part of a dragnet search for the identities of protesters who entered a Minnesota church in March.

The devices, which help police track the location of vehicles tied to crimes, have become the subject of nationwide backlash in recent months over more nefarious uses by officers. Congressmen Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democrat representing Chicago suburbs, and Michael Cloud, a Republican whose Texas district includes Corpus Christi, are cosponsoring the bill. If the legislation is passes this year, states that fail to comply with it would begin losing out on tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars in annual transportation funding starting in October 2028.

The Department of Transportation calculates the amount of so-called surface transportation funds it gives to states based on factors such as how many roadways they have and how busy they are.

What happens next

Congress has repeatedly threatened taking away the funding to pressure states into taking action on public safety. The tactic helped establish a national minimum drinking age, standard rules for what constitutes driving under the influence, and regulations for billboards alongside highways. But it’s unclear whether any legislation designed to address voters’ concerns will advance through Congress anytime soon, let alone gain the approval of President Donald Trump. One report found at least 100 instances of alleged abuse over the past eight years.

“Taxpayers shouldn't be forced to fund the shredding of their own civil liberties or the growth of a surveillance state,” Cloud said in a statement. The bill is “a first step toward reining in unchecked surveillance,” Cloud said, adding, “we can protect public safety without sacrificing the privacy of Americans. ”CommentsBack to topJoin the discussionCommentsBack to topYou Might Also LikeIn your inbox: Upgrade your life with WIRED-tested gearMcDonald’s built a 515-page dossier on meBig Story: AI is dead—organoids are aliveThe manosphere is a multibillion-dollar grievance industryHow to find us: Add WIRED. com to your preferred sources in GoogleParesh Dave is a senior writer for WIRED, covering the inner workings of Big Tech companies.

He writes about how apps and gadgets are built and about their impacts while giving voice to the stories of the underappreciated and disadvantaged.

Was this article useful?