Home Cybersecurity Cloudflare/Security-Audit-Skill
CYBERSECURITY

Cloudflare/Security-Audit-Skill

Cloudflare/Security-Audit-Skill. Please reload this page. cloudflare / security-audit-skill Public Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings Fork 472 Star 8.

What happened

Files File Purpose SKILL. md Setup, core principles, platform terminology, workflow overview, and audit anti-patterns RECONNAISSANCE. md Phase 1 reconnaissance prompts and synthesis instructions HUNTING. md Phase 2 orchestration, hunting methodology, and validation rules ATTACK-CLASSES. md Core, wildcard, and obvious-things attack prompts MEMORY-SAFETY-AND-BINARY. md Memory-safety, binary, and kernel hunting classes for native targets AI-AND-LLM. md Prompt-injection, agent/tool, and output-handling hunting classes for LLM-backed targets WEB-PROTOCOL-AND-AUTH. md HTTP request-framing, cache, and authentication-protocol hunting classes for HTTP-protocol and auth targets CLIENT-SIDE. md DOM-injection, messaging-trust, UI-redress, and prototype-pollution hunting classes for client-side/browser targets SUPPLY-CHAIN-AND-RELEASE. md Dependency, CI, release, signing, update, plugin, and extension hunting classes CLOUD-AND-DEPLOYMENT. md IAM, infrastructure-as-code, container, serverless, ingress, and runtime-configuration hunting classes PROTOCOLS-RPC-AND-MESSAGING. md RPC, serialization, queue, broker, webhook, and streaming-protocol hunting classes RESOURCE-EXHAUSTION-AND-AVAILABILITY. md Shared resource, quota, queue, worker, and operator-spend hunting classes DATA-ISOLATION-AND-LIFECYCLE. md Tenant isolation, cache, search, export, backup, migration, deletion, and restore hunting classes DESKTOP-MOBILE-AND-LOCAL-IPC. md Native app, deep-link, webview, exported-component, helper, daemon, and local-IPC hunting classes VALIDATION-AND-REPORTING. md Phases 3–6 candidate validation, structured output, record verification, and reporting report-schema. json JSON schema for all three findings. json verdicts validate-findings. cjs Zero-dependency validator for findings. json in Phases 4 and 5 validate-findings. test. cjs Findings-validator tests and producer-compatible fixture checks validate-coverage-ledger. cjs Zero-dependency validator for coverage-ledger. json in Phases 1–5 validate-coverage-ledger. test. cjs Coverage-ledger validator tests Installation Install the skill with the Skills CLI: npx skills add https://github. com/cloudflare/security-audit-skill \ –skill security-audit Use –global for a user-level installation: npx skills add https://github. com/cloudflare/security-audit-skill \ –skill security-audit \ –global Run npx skills –help for agent-selection and non-interactive options.

5k mainBranchesTagsGo to fileCodeOpen more actions menuLatest commit History14 Commits14 CommitsFolders and filesNameNameLast commit messageLast commit dateskills/security-auditskills/security-audit LICENSELICENSE README. mdREADME. md View all filesRepository files navigationsecurity-audit A coding-agent skill that turns your agent into a security auditor. Usage Start your coding agent in (or pointed at) the codebase you want to audit, then ask it to do a security audit: security audit this codebase find security vulnerabilities in. /src do a security review, output to ~/audits/my-project The skill activates automatically when the request matches its trigger (security audit, find vulnerabilities, pen-test the code, etc. ).

In full audit mode, an unspecified output directory defaults to ~/security-audit-skill//run-. AboutA coding-agent skill for multi-phase security audits with independently verified, machine-readable findingsResourcesReadmeMIT licenseCode of conductCode of conductContributingContributingSecurity policySecurity policyActivityCustom propertiesStars8. This is the skill that seeded Cloudflare's vulnerability discovery harness, described in Build your own vulnerability harness. What it does The skill runs a structured audit in six phases: Reconnaissance — map architecture, trust boundaries, input surfaces, prior evidence, and deterministic coverage in architecture. md and coverage-ledger. json.

The wider picture

Contact Questions, feedback, or comparing notes on AI-driven security tooling: security-ai-research@cloudflare. com License MIT — see LICENSE. The harness grew into a multi-stage, fleet-wide system; this skill is the single-repo starting point it evolved from. The skill uses prior ledgers and findings to target gaps, revalidate changed source, and carry forward current-source evidence without treating stale or unresolved work as covered. A direct codebase audit or pen-test request uses full audit mode. Security questions and focused vulnerability work use guidance mode unless you request report artifacts.

Skip to content You signed in with another tab or window. You switched accounts on another tab or window. It orchestrates isolated agents through reconnaissance, coverage-led hunting, candidate validation, structured output, independent record verification, and target-neutral reporting.

What has been reported

Coverage-led hunting — assign isolated hunters from ledger units, record their checks, and use coverage critics to find gaps. Candidate validation — give every unique candidate to a fresh verifier that tries to disprove it. Structured output — write confirmed, needs_validation, and rejected records to findings. json and validate them against report-schema. json. Independent record verification — fresh agents verify final source claims. Material replacements receive another independent verifier. Target-neutral reporting — derive REPORT. md, FINDINGS-DETAIL. md, and NEEDS-VALIDATION. md from the verified records and coverage ledger.

The parent runs validate-coverage-ledger. cjs after creating the ledger and after each later ledger update. It runs validate-findings. cjs in Phase 4 and again after every Phase 5 replacement.

What happens next

The verdicts are distinct: confirmed has a complete source trace and bounded observed result, needs_validation has an exact unresolved fact and no severity, and rejected records a disproved candidate. Multiple runs against the same repo are additive. The workflow writes inside the target repository only when you explicitly select a directory that version control ignores. Requirements A coding agent with a model that supports tool use and parallel sub-agents Node. js for the zero-dependency findings and coverage-ledger validators An OS-enforced sandbox for target-controlled builds, tests, processes, browsers, emulators, fuzzers, and fixtures.

It must disable external networking, use a sanitized allowlisted environment, enforce resource limits, and allow writes only to assigned scratch paths. Without these controls, the workflow keeps the lead as needs_validation instead of executing target code. Design principles Only confirm established boundary failures.

Was this article useful?