The Census Bureau Is Overrun With Staffers From a MAGA Think Tank

The Census Bureau Is Overrun With Staffers From a MAGA Think Tank. Skip to main contentSave this storySave this storyMultiple staffers at a Trump-aligned policy think tank have burrowed their way into the US Census Bureau, where they have access to sensitive data and have contributed to a public report that bolsters conspiracy theories undermining trust in elections ahead of the midterms.

What happened

The project appears to be led by Michael Lachanski, the bureau’s recently appointed deputy director for data, policy, and science, and a former fellow at the Claremont Institute, a conservative think tank that also has connections to the Trump administration. In August, the Census Bureau published an anonymously authored report titled “Noncitizen Voting in the 2020 Election: A Beginning Analysis,” claiming to show that thousands of noncitizens voted in the 2020 election. A WIRED investigation revealed that the report appeared to employ faulty methodology, casting its conclusions into doubt, and that two of its authors work for the America First Policy Institute, a right-wing think tank with deep ties to the Trump administration.

Now WIRED has found that the two authors are part of a larger team, made up almost entirely of AFPI members, who have been detailed to the Census Bureau and given access to its data. A Census employee who spoke to WIRED on the condition of anonymity says that there has historically been “nothing close” to what AFPI is doing at the bureau. Earlier this year, WIRED reported that the Department of Commerce, which oversees the bureau, was circulating a rule change that would eliminate noncitizens from being counted in the Census, a move that could drastically reshape how Congressional districts are drawn.

In addition to Matthew Jensen and Jeff McCrea, the two AFPI members previously identified by WIRED, at least five other AFPI members have been or are currently staffed at the Census Bureau, according to sources and documents reviewed by WIRED.

The wider picture

The Census Bureau and AFPI did not respond to requests for comment. John Abowd, former associate director for research and methodology and chief scientist at the Census Bureau, says that having so many people from a single organization would be “unusual. ”Among the names viewed by WIRED are Max Kossek, a researcher at AFPI’s Office for Fiscal and Regulatory Analysis, and Ryan Montgomery, who the website lists as a program assistant with the same AFPI office.

AFPI’s director for secure elections policy, Thomas Lane, is also listed as one of the employees that has been detailed to the Census Bureau. David Peterson, who AFPI lists as a research engineer with expertise in “computing, machine learning, and advanced software architecture,” and Jackson Mejia, an AFPI fellow who is an assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin with a PhD in economics from MIT focusing on tax policy, also appear to be detailed to the Census Bureau.

AFPI did not confirm whether Corey was currently associated with the think tank. Danah Boyd, a professor at Cornell University who studies the census, says that there are vehicles like the American Association for the Advancement of Science through which agencies like the Census Bureau might bring in multiple IPAs. Recent reporting from Talking Points Memo found that the Census Bureau’s Data Stewardship Executive Policy charter had been updated in July to remove stipulations that prevented political appointees from interfering with the bureau’s data.

There is precedent for political pressure at the Census Bureau: In 2021, less than two weeks after the January 6 insurrection at the end of Trump’s first term, then US Census Bureau director Steven Dillingham announced his resignation after a letter from the Office of the Inspector General revealed that whistleblowers had come forward to allege Census workers had been pressured by political appointees to create a report showing the citizenship status of every US resident.

What has been reported

The US Census is home to vast troves of sensitive data on nearly every person living in the country, which is used for apportioning and drawing congressional districts as well as allocating federal funding based on population sizes. Experts and Census employees who spoke to WIRED worry that the noncitizen voting report is the first salvo in Census data possibly being used to undermine the results of the upcoming midterms or the 2028 presidential election. The Trump administration has repeatedly attempted to cast doubt on the accuracy of Census data in order to reshape elections.

Republicans also took aim at a little-known statistical method called differential privacy that is used to protect the privacy of individual respondents, alleging that it makes the Census count inaccurate in ways that favor Democrats in congressional apportionment. Former AFPI staffers have found their way to some of the highest ranks of the Trump administration, including former attorney general Pam Bondi, secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins, secretary of Housing and Urban Development Scott Turner, Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin, US permanent representative to NATO Matthew Whitaker, deputy director of White House Domestic Policy Council Heidi Overton, and National Economic Council of the United States director Kevin Hassett.

Another person, listed as an IPA from AFPI, Michael Corey, is also listed among the group at the bureau. All of the AFPI members are listed under the same project, focused on “ad hoc data analyses” to answer questions from senior leaders at Census and the Department of Commerce, according to documentation viewed by WIRED. All of the AFPI detailees appear to have the “special sworn status” necessary to access sensitive Census data.

What happens next

Another Census employee, who spoke to WIRED on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the press, says that access to Census data is only allowed through approved “projects,” where employees and researchers have to explain how they're going to use the data and what they're going to produce. Boyd says this kind of work is a clear departure from the bureau’s mandate, which does not include providing data to political appointees.

Vittoria ElliottA MAGA County’s Top Election Official Wants to Hire Election Denial Superstar Tina PetersTina Peters was convicted of seven counts related to election interference in 2024. “I think it’s a good idea for the American people to keep more of their money,” Bessent said in response to a question from Democratic congressman Juan Vargas at a financial services committee hearing today. The FBI director has sued the magazine, and the author of a story it published, filing a defamation lawsuit in US district court for the District of Columbia that seeks $250m in damages.

“Frankly, it's disrespectful to the institution,” they say. AFPI, meanwhile, has been integral to shaping the Trump administration’s policies and makeup.

The report has been compiled by The Daily Waves using information reported across wired.com, theguardian.com. Details are presented according to the information available at the time of publication and may change as authorities, organisers or other relevant parties provide updates.